InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1906
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/26/2006

Re: DannyDuplex post# 63493

Saturday, 08/04/2012 10:53:12 AM

Saturday, August 04, 2012 10:53:12 AM

Post# of 81577
DanntMac, you make a good, if frightening, point

As Flp has stated, Capstone certainly doesn't have squat in the way of assets that a competitor would want but they do have a certain "nuisance value" in the marketplace. And their Chinese supplier relationship might be of interest to supplement a takeover company's playtoys.

So a sale of the company at even the present low capitalized value might make sense if a only handful of directors stood to profit from same. If these directors/insiders granted themselves shares of a new "B2 Preferred Stock" with highly selective liquidation rights, they could benefit from a "fire sale" of the corporation even while the average shareholder receives nothing, or a tiny pittance for his shares.

To do this, the group would have to control 50.1% of the outstanding shares.

Jeffrey Postal is trying to buy 50M Shares.

Wallach has a history of taking a controlling interest in companies and then selling them.

A previous attempt to vest control in Wallach and Postal and allow them virtual unlimited power to sell off the operating division to themselves, or others, failed and was officially deemed a mistake!

Draw your own conclusions.



All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. - Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)