InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 380
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/01/2010

Re: None

Thursday, 08/02/2012 7:03:09 AM

Thursday, August 02, 2012 7:03:09 AM

Post# of 12118
Courtesy of Jonnyqwan Raging Bull #326976:

" As I said, I think that LG and VCSY have come to a settlement agreement. In order to settle things between those two parties, they need to seperate themselves with Samsung, which is joined with them in the previous lawsuit.


My thinking is that VCSY will make sure that the terms of the settlement will be confidential, and they surely would not want Samsung to have access to the details of the settlement terms and VCSY will want to have mediation details considered priviledged information and not be subject to subpoena by other parties (ie... Samsung and/or Interwoven). I did some DD and discovered that some states will NOT allow confidential settlement details and/or mediation details to be released to outside parties via a subpoena, so that information will truly remain confidential. Two of those states happen to be New Jersey and California!


Are things making more sense now? "



All Statements are just opinions and should not be viewed as advice

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.