Monday, July 30, 2012 8:07:30 PM
1. The USPTO has already considered the first patent in suit, and determine the SL patent did not infringe.
2. The USPTO issued the SP patent before the second, and final, patent in suit.
3. SP doesn't use a barcode.
4. SP uses a logo in their resolution process.
4. SP doesn't resolve on the handset as the patents in suit both claim.
So NeoMedia will need to re-file and assert new patents. Therefore settlement is nowhere near. Given that set of basic facts, no lawyer would let you settle. Maybe some year in the future, but not this year.
“It ain’t so much the things we don’t know that get us into trouble. It’s the things we know that just ain’t so.” Henry Wheeler Shaw
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM