InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,431.60
(
-0.04%
)
US TECH 100
19,176.00
(
0.56%
)
Dow Jones
38,589.16
(
-0.15%
)
Brent Oil
82.28
(
0.37%
)
Bitcoin
65,972.67
(
-1.18%
)
Post# of 62039
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Citrati

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 319
Posts 15887
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2010

Citrati

Re: thizsukz post# 15101

Monday, 07/30/2012 12:32:18 PM

Monday, July 30, 2012 12:32:18 PM

Post# of 62039
There should be sufficient volume to create liquidity for sellers without significant chart and PPS damage. That is not the case at present. The $ amount is just a way of indicating the lack of liquidity.

Based on last 2 weeks for example. If you needed to sell 50,000 shares you would be looking at .003 or below for the trade to get executed. $150. Then if you wanted to buy back in you would have to pay .007 or better. $350. Lack of volume (liquidity) would cost you $200. Not a good situation.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up