cash4, Your right about 1 thing. I'm not your enemy. Sorry I mustve missed the "proof" you posted. All I got out of your post is you lost a lot of money that apperantly you couldn't afford to lose and a website. I seen nothing that would constitute a p&d. I would probably have an easier time agreeing with you if there were legit flags of a p&d going on here. Instead I see the opposite. Here is what I see that GDGI has going for it....
1.) REAL PRODUCT- Most p&d's have none, they just say they are in development
2.) REAL PATENTS- Most p&d's have none, they just say they will in the near future.
3.) REAL REVENUE- Most p&d's have none, see 1&2 as to why.
4.) COMPANY CONTACT- Investment relations. Many here continue to have repeated contact. Ray Wyman has told me he wants investors/possible investors to feel free to contact him with comments,questions,concerns. Most p&ds you CAN NOT get in touch with anyone and if you actually do then you get fluff.
5.) SHARE STRUCTURE- Most p&ds when promoted sell the crap out of their shares. Doubleday through his DD has called the T/A several times and the SS is still the same as it was in May. He has told and even give the # for investors to check for themselves.
6.) PRESS RELEASES- Most p&ds that send out press releases DO NOT name names or actual sales numbers. They send out FLUFF that says nothing.
I've been to the website you mention many times and use it as part of my DD. They say they receive no money to do this but have you considered that the possibility that they may own positions in a company that competes? Most companies use promotions to bring attention to their company. I can't think of a better way to bring attention to a company that needs to bring attention from investors. Are there p&ds out there in pinky land ABSOLUTELY! Do they act like GDGI? NO! GDGI is upfront company that is trying to make their pattents and products go. The things I've mentioned above are all verifiable and can easily be proven. Like I said earlier, I'm not your enemy. I invite you to give facts for your statements. I listen to both sides good and bad. I just have a hard time when a stock gets bashed and the poster cannot disclose reasons other than refering to a definition of a p&d from a QUESTIONABLE website. I say questionable because they like everyone else is not there to save you millions or billions. They are there to make money too. How do they make their money? Until they disclose that I'll look there but also question their motives too. As always this is all my opinion and hope everyone does their own DD and decide for themselves if GDGI is worth supporting with their money
