DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

Speaking of lies ebo, you are now guilty yourself.

Two patents HAVE received 'final rejection'. This means that they are no longer viable in their present form. This is the definition of 'failed'.

That there are avenues available to continue them, after complete rewrites, is a fact that you are clinging to, but it does not detract from the failure of the initial patents.

It is as if one were designing and building a rocket ship only to see it explode on the launchpad. If one then gathers up all of the pieces and melts them down with the intention of building a bicycle out of the scrap, it can be argued that the project 'continues' and is not dead. Regardless of the eventual success of the bicycle, the rocket was a failure.

I would also like to comment on this travesty;

People on this board KNOW that Tony's leading edge science is so far beyond the knowledge of the patent office's low paid reviewers that they can't understand it and he has to keep explaining it to them.

Isn't it unfortunate that all of the people on this board that KNOW such things are incapable of explaining them to anyone else and are, in fact, ignorant of the science itself? Their 'knowlege' is based on their wish to believe, not in an actual understanding of the science. It is also unfortunate that all of those people that actually understand the science (and there are many) don't share your beliefs.

regards,
frog