InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,760.74
(
-0.21%
)
Post# of 74729
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

budmgd

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 28
Posts 3875
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/18/2012

budmgd

Re: jerry2525 post# 46081

Friday, 07/20/2012 8:05:51 PM

Friday, July 20, 2012 8:05:51 PM

Post# of 74729
A thought about the "fluff pr's" and the absence thereof.... Many seem to be making the argument that these must be good guys and not scam artists simply because they didn't issue nonsense pr's on the way down. Has anyone ever thought that maybe that is EXACTLY why they didn't issue pr's? I mean wouldn't it be that much easier to deny that the officers of the company "mislead" anyone into buying these shares from .01 all the way down to .0001 if they never said anything at all? Just a thought....
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up