NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[Tonguehair]

Maybe, but it is kind of misleading to use that article as a source. The guy specifically states that he issued an invitation for folks to give their opinions. Some poster on this board even concurred that he was one of the folks who offered the Goog / neom reference. It's kind of disingenuous to point to an "article" as confirmation of a connection when the source of the article's content are the very folks who go on to use the article as confirmation. Kind of circular, don't you think?

And Wooger, this borders on the shameless:

http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB00412&read=663892

(Self-ponderance: If one owns neom and then refers to a Wooger post as shameless, can one be said to truly own (I mean, really, deep down in the heart of hearts) -- truly own neom?)