Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals Inc. (fka RCPIQ)

[thefamilyman]

skiguy28 - "The only thing I find interesting in your post is that based on the words used and the writing style, I am now 90% sure you are Patrick Cox."

And I am 90% sure you are silence_twain. I'm 70% sure you're also Adam Feuerstein which leaves a 30% chance that you're Martin Shkreli.

skiguy28 -
1. "...It is the fundamentals which are being debated by the bears and the bulls, not what the chart looks like."

My mistake. I thought it was the future price action that was being debated. How foolish of me...

skiguy28 -
2. "When I said celebrity endorsements mean nothing I was referring to how a celebrity can be tricked into thinking something is working when there is no real science behind the product. ...I always liked Fred Couples and I am glad that he is being paid to endorse the product."

Most celebrity endorsements occur because a company went searching for "a" celebrity to endorse their product. In this case, Fred Couples approached Star AFTER he tried the product and was convinced that it WORKS! BIG difference.

skiguy28 -
3. "I am going to talk about the patent validity in a way you might understand. Let's say you have a patent on a square tire and you sue Goodyear. Goodyear comes to court asks for your square tire patent to be re-examined. While that is going on, a jury finds that even if the square tire patent is upheld, Goodyear did not infringe because Goodyear sells a round tire. That is what you have here. Reynolds asked for the patents to be re-examined. They were and they were upheld. That is great. The only problem is that it has also been ruled that Reynolds did not infringe on the patents if valid. What good is a valid patent if someone does not infringe on it? The Supreme Court holding up the patents means nothing because it was ruled that Reynolds did not infringe if they were valid."

What a ridiculous comparison. Justhinkin did a very good job of illuminating your flawed analysis on this topic in his responses to your comments on seekingalpha at the website hyperlinked below.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/671331-star-scientific-is-on-a-run-who-s-buying-and-who-s-selling

skiguy28 -
4. "I remember a few years back when everyone was so convinced that Reynolds would lose to Star and when Star lost the stock dropped below $2. It had been above $5 recently before then and then dropped like a stone. The bulls seem to have placed a lot of faith that this mediation will result in hundreds of millions of dollars. If it does not, under $2 might be just around the corner."

Yes, we are perfectly aware that you and your friends will say or do whatever you think you can get away with to protect your short position. We still remember the false delisting story that you or one of your friends planted with Bloomberg when Star went over $5. And as I told you previously, "If the price drops because of another court decision, I'll buy more stock."

http://seekingalpha.com/article/671331-star-scientific-is-on-a-run-who-s-buying-and-who-s-selling

skiguy28 -
"5. It is nice that Johns Hopkins is looking into the product, but that means very little."

Really? I guess we will know when the results of the human study for thyroid disease, currently being conducted by Johns Hopkins, are released. It makes no sense that such highly reputed medical professionals would put their reputations on the line, with repeated presentations at high profile venues, for a "food supplement". Unless of course, they are already confident that it will work in humans. Oh that's right! They HAVE already seen it work in at least one human subject. Maybe they are not risking their reputations after all?

skiguy28 -
"Numerous small drug companies (note Anatabloc is an OTC dietary supplement not an FDA approved drug, but I need to use drug companies as an example) have a drug that gets through phase 1 and phase 2, but their stock gets wiped out when the drug gets to phase 3 testing and fails. Large companies have drug trials that fail as well. It is not that these companies are running a scam, it is just that what they thought would materialize does not."

From what you say, I guess it's a good thing Anatabine is "just" a food supplement. No matter what happens with any of the many studies underway, Anatabloc is already on the market and will continue to be sold. And when those studies are positive, the public will not have to wait for a bunch of FDA red tape to start taking it.

Every study on anatabine for which the results have been announced has been TREMENDOUSLY positive! Results documented so far include: reduced plaque formation in alzheimers, "dramatically" reduced rate of paralysis in MS, reduced C-Reactive Protein levels, and of course the statement by Dr. Ladenson that anatabine is the only known substance to stop thyroiditis. So far, the only human study was the CRP study. The rest were animal studies. But human studies are now approved and underway, including the "Flint" study for which a Michigan TV station has provided us a preview. The publication of results from any one of the on-going studies could be the catalyst that sparks major network coverage of this major medical breakthrough.

skiguy28 -
"The reason I think that Anatabloc is more scam than science is because of the history of the company behind it."

As I stated previously, there is already more than enough scientific evidence available to belie your statement. Only someone who's shorting this stock could ignore all the evidence and claim to believe "Anatabloc is more scam than science."

skiguy28 -
"You will forgive me for not being swayed by numerous anonymous testimonials that could be posted by anyone or even the same person under various user names."

I know this is not the case because of my own experience with Anatabloc. I thank the Lord that he gave me a decades long malady that responded quickly (and quite unexpectedly) to Anatabloc. Because of that, I believe that I have an advantage over many in the investment community (like you) who apparently don't believe it works.

skiguy28 -
"The reason that Anatabloc is an OTC dietary supplement and getting FDA approval is not being discussed is because I believe Star knows it would never hold up under the scrutiny of FDA required testing."

This is total BS. The FDA determined the "category" for anatabine. The FDA determined it was a food supplement.

Anatabloc works! And a significant percentage of those who try it will believe and many of those will invest - just like I did. If you're smart, you'll cover while you can.