InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 1052
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/28/2012

Re: 1Coyote post# 78606

Friday, 07/06/2012 4:38:57 PM

Friday, July 06, 2012 4:38:57 PM

Post# of 93821
I like DM, but... They did make a couple of major blunders..1) somewhere around half the products they listed against samsung had to be dropped because they weren't even sold in the US.

2) the signature product they accused in samsung the one they held up as a standard for the suit had be dropped because it didn't infringe. The very product they held up as the model of infringement to represent the case.

3) when they were crying about not getting all those spec manuals and the samsung attorneys had to tell James SZE former engineer at qulacom and current DM attorney how to do an internet search for such items.

Not exactly comforting moments ... But the real killer for me is all the speculation and implying that went on on these boards about the 100s of millions some per case we could expect. We watched as post contained links to one company settling with another for 500 million and of course our tech was more pivotal to digital age. And then we saw our first settlement with one of largest companies in the world for 1.25 million.

But of course this we were told was the first company got the deal and others were gonna pay more and much more the closer to markman they got much much more oh and DM needed this to make themselves whole I think is how it was phrased. Sadly we saw once again the truth doesn't seem to follow edig and samsung the largest CE company paid many months later closer to the markman less the first who got the deal.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.