InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 110
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2012

Re: None

Wednesday, 07/04/2012 5:26:14 PM

Wednesday, July 04, 2012 5:26:14 PM

Post# of 63185
Though I have not read the entire affidavit; the basis of what this case is being founded upon seems ludacris. If the Fischers' truely believe that the emeralds were stolen from them, wouldn't that have been their first attempt at claiming them??? This sounds more criminal than civil. There would have to be a police report filed one would assume, and I doubt that this current judge would be the ruler in that case. This seems alomost to ridiculous to be true. Oh, so our idea of the emeralds floating away in a barrell failed so now we will say that someone stole them from right beneath our noses, gave them to Jay, and we want them back??? And to top it off, we have an email that someone sent (this someone who has beef with Jay ) stating that Jay said that he stole the emeralds from the Fischers. C'mon. This is all hear-say, and I believe hear-say is objectible in court. At least in criminal court...which is where it would seem like this will be heading.

All my opinion. Any other thoughts?

Would be nice to see someone post the affidavit on here if it is legal to do so.