Let's say Piesold does get a reply into the DRMS in a timely manner.
The DRMS then decides that THEY need another review period. (They always seem to need extra time to comprehend the simplest of data, much less a more comprehensive reply.)
Now are you going to say the additional review period is the fault of CGFI's management? Why?
Seems that the blame and responsibility for any delay, no matter who requests it, is prejudged to be CGFI's fault. That seems to be the pattern of thought here.
Responsibility for delays cannot be as one sided as it is being presented.
Just review the past requests from the DRMS. That agency appears not to be solely capable of making a decision. Hence the request for MLRB review and intervention.
Don't take my word for it, Do your own research! Then you will know it's true!
