InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: THE_BAMFACTSTER!! post# 56696

Friday, 06/29/2012 2:57:10 PM

Friday, June 29, 2012 2:57:10 PM

Post# of 60937
I understand. I remember reading it. I just believe it was dicta - non-relevant musings of the judge that do not actually have legal influence or precedence.

And Elis is right. The three years I am referring to are in the law. It is intended to protect creditors of the company - to allow them time to find out what is going on and sue the company. I do not believe that any distribution of funds to shareholders can occur before that period is over and the judge agrees to the final distribution. IMO there is no reason to be in any rush.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.