It would have been redundant to include them, but if you feel they prove your side of the discussion, please feel free to provide a link to them. I think you will see that the documents you claim are arguments with Mr Guyer are in fact requests for information that is subsequently supplied in the documents that I cited in the links I provided. But, please, have at it. A few items of documentation to support your claims would be a welcome change.
While you are at it, perhaps you can find some documentation that supports the accusation that the POW mill is in disrepair. After all, that was the main topic of your many posts. I await the CGFI related information showing the support for your claim of lack of POW mill maintenance.
Don't take my word for it,Do your own research! Then you will know it's true!
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.