InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 2631
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/26/2011

Re: Zorax post# 48462

Wednesday, 06/27/2012 12:14:14 PM

Wednesday, June 27, 2012 12:14:14 PM

Post# of 67010

Please go re-read the most recent adequacy letter to Cgi from the DRMS.
It's way beyond 1 valve.

Cgi has many formidable issues to “physically” fix to operate the mill, let alone get a permit.



Here is a link to the letter you asked us to review:
http://drmsweblink.state.co.us/drmsweblink/0/doc/957111/Electronic.aspx?searchid=2c98f17b-f256-45aa-b924-c130c3f90ef1
Perhaps you were mistaken. Or we're you switching topics in the same post?
Nowhere does this letter discuss the condition of the operating capability of the POW mill.
"Cgi has many formidable issues to “physically” fix to operate the mill" IS INACCURATE.

The document you referenced (if I have it right, if not please give us a link to YOUR letter.)
Discusses the proposed dry stack project, or AM-03 as it is referred to by the DRMS and MLRB.
An error, or misdirection? Please correct your assertion or show us the referenced "most recent adequacy letter to Cgi from the DRMS".

Don't take my word for it, Do your own research! Then you will know it's true!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.