InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 334
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/11/2010

Re: Paul Wall post# 12939

Tuesday, 06/26/2012 3:34:46 PM

Tuesday, June 26, 2012 3:34:46 PM

Post# of 13136
If they do not want to invite future litigation then all possibilities that would affect PPS must be presented to the shareholders including worst possible scenarios (ex: terrorist attack) that would affect PPS or raise doubts about it continuing as a going concern. It is a possibility that a meteor will hit my car tomorrow but you do not see me moving it around to make it harder to hit ... lol.

Bottom line is if you believe AWSR will become profitable.

* They did not close down when they encounterd the shifting rock seam
* Expenditures were made to acquire the Wildcat Loadout Facility
* Activities still continued to develop and acquire a third miner
* Contracts still in place for 3 years
* Clents showing interest when production increases are available
* Adequate coal reserves for 15 years
* Still filing required returns
* Low Sulfur Coal product soon to be in greater demand.

I don't care about where the company has been but I do see them positioning themselves to become profitable in the future. Any news about the second miner being back online will skyrocket this stock and the timeline is now that for this to happen. It was earlier estimated that it would take 6 to 8 months to handle the shifting rock seam and put the second miner back online so this news should happen any day now.

IMO

This post is my personal opinion. I do not provide investment advice.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.