I'll let you guys argue whatever concerning DW. I have my own opinion, which really isn't relevant. After looking over the latest filing by Tmob they have made an interesting assertion. They are claiming that since The Daic parties have only a creditor type status, they can not bring forth this litigation, since they are not owners of the patent. See they gave up ownership rights in the last settlement agreement and decided to take only a percentage of a settlement. I think an interesting point for the judge and possibly a sticky point. That is a point that might possibly get the Daic parties kicked out of this case, my guess. I would have to read up on the actual legal requirements to bring a suit like this, but they may very well be onto something. Very interesting. So basically can the Daic parties sue someone if they don't have an ownership interest and are only creditors? I'm thinking the last settlement agreement, just got them kicked out and any filings they have made become null and void. Unless there is something in the secret settlement agreement that says they still own some portion of Calypso, we don't know that. Turrini would. Like I said, I'll have to try and do some reading up on this issue.
AI
