Dear, ulfahl: It appears, in the reading of this post of yours, that all of the ''information'' that can be read here about KMAG & Jeff Reid, that READS IN A VERY NEGATIVE WAY, is information that you personally received back from them, in answer to you. All I can honestly say is that they have a way of making it all look very impressive & very verifiable, so that one might conclude that it is, in fact, true & accurate. So, what are we all supposed to think? Does anyone know for an absolute incontrovertible fact that these ALLEGATIONS are not true? And if so, how?
''allegations |?ali'ga sh ?n|''
noun
a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof : he made allegations of corruption against the administration | allegations that the army was operating a shoot-to-kill policy.
ORIGIN late Middle English : from Latin allegatio(n-), from allegare ‘allege.'
as opposed to the word:
accusation |?aky?'za sh ?n; ?akyoo-|
noun
a charge or claim, (and apparently with proof) that someone has done something illegal or wrong : accusations of bribery.
• the action or process of making such a charge or claim : there was accusation in Brian's voice.
ORIGIN late Middle English : from Old French, from Latin accusatio(n-), from accusare ‘call to account’ (see accuse ).
Now, I know that one is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, and that the burden of proof is ''supposed to be on the party making the accusation(s), but, as we all too often know, that is not the way that it works out in actuality. So, how can we once & for all know for an INDUBITABLE & INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT THAT ALL OF OUR ''SUPPOSED GOOD DD'' UP TO THE PRESENT TIME IS THE UNVARNISHED TRUTH & TRUSTWORTHY? And also that, all that minny-poo is ''alleging'', is just that:''POO''! For they sure do make it look like in the said info that they've ''got the proof''. In conclusion, after having read your post, please realize how much it grieves me to have to write such a post as this one is. Sincerely, Jaime
