InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 14414
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2003

Re: Mr. Zen post# 2985

Saturday, 09/10/2005 10:01:53 AM

Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:01:53 AM

Post# of 7422
Doubloon, maybe they can't make money in the pottery biz, otherwise why not have a "pottery grade" and a "nano grade"? The chemical companies do it all the time, "food grade" may be the same product as "industrial grade", but must be packaged in clean rooms and/or shipped in dedicated tankers.
If they could make money in the pottery biz, it would pay for more mining of the clay, and the "best" clay for the nano biz could either be left in place or stockpiled. If nano applications take off, they could concentrate on that biz only and drop the pottery biz.

My feeling is that any clay nano biz could be years away, if at all. They have not announced any progress for the clay prep and, IMO, cannot guarantee any consistancy of product to customers long term, because it is unmined and has natural occurring inconsistancies. Also do a Google on antifouling paints, there are many companies with proven products that have been tested for years and meet EPA requirements. The Navy patent is nice, but any products IN QUANTITY may be years away if at all.

JMO, but this is way too speculative long term, and better nano plays out there.


Cash is King until further notice!!!

My comments on companies are usually my opinion of long term success (years). The PPS may go up or down greatly in the meantime depending on the number of greedy suckers with money.