Colorado Goldfields Inc. (fka CGFI)

[Zorax]

...It is misleading because it could have been taken from a large sample group until 2 of 3 did agree, long story short.

Good point. However in my case it was only the 2 professional engineers I was conversing with directly about the Cgi support letter from Anderson. The other people eavesdropping on us, since we were around the same table, just had to put their 2 cents in as well, no one thought the letter was a positive thing. Too bad we didn't have more time. Some even wondered how anyone could send a letter like that to a Governor. These are people who don't know anything about pink sheet cgfia but they did know about communicating with government agencies and Governors.

When one looks at the Cgi support letter campaign without emotion and attachment, one can see an idea honestly, that may have gone a long way had it been done without ANY accusations and blaming comments and only discuss all virtues of Cgi. The petition was practically the only positive letter in the lot, some questionable claims, but all in all, an upbeat effort.

I don't think the cgfia shareholders on this board are considering how these 'negative-placing the blame on Mr. Erickson and DRMS support letters' are reflecting on guyer and Cgi credibility out in the real world. There's more than just chat boards and promoters involved here.

and now, really good night.