I'll take Tom Anderson's 44 years of experience, his MBA, PE, and diploma from the Colorado School of Mining, (Class of 1985) as a better indication of his knowledge and experience than the fallacious contention that the letter was "sub par for a professional". Anyone with 44 years of mining experience is entitled to express his opinion regarding mining operations. What makes it "sub par"? A simple missing letter in a single word does not negate the decades of experience he evidently has.
If that is the basis for the posted opinion, then the "sub par" judgement is "sub par" in its evidentiary value. I also include the accusation that he is a "friend of Guyer". Absolutely no basis in fact for that accusation. "Sub par" contentions for sure!
Don't take my word for it, Do your own research! Then you will know it's true!
