InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 295
Posts 26523
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

Re: Senorita Roachita post# 10439

Wednesday, 06/20/2012 10:28:41 AM

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 10:28:41 AM

Post# of 39209
Last quarterly financial, filed 4 weeks ago, page 56. Also, I would read filings as opposed to relying on websites.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=8632452#FORM10-Q_033112_HTM_ITEM6OTHER

On August 2, 2011, we received official notification from the FDA that the review of our Section 510(k) premarket notification application had been completed and that the FDA determined that the device, (CTLM®), is not substantially equivalent to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to any device which has been reclassified into Class I (General Controls) or Class II (Special Controls), or to another device found to be substantially equivalent through the Section 510(k) process. This decision was based on the fact that the FDA was not aware of a legally marketed preamendments device labeled or promoted for using “Diffuse Optical Tomography” (DOT) to image the optical attenuation properties of breast tissue in order to aid the diagnosis of cancer, other conditions, diseases, or abnormalities. Although the FDA did not use the term “rejected” in the NSE letter, the effect of this letter is that our Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device (CTLM®) has been rejected.


Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.