well we all know that UMA has problems, its just paving the
way for the next level, imho is an ASNAP-like technology
and such a technology will go w/ the most cost effective
infrastructure,
if you want to criticize clyw show us not what companies are
doing, but how it will benefit them more than clyw? that is
how it will be better?
if you still need indoor cabling w/ wimax, then you are
back to wifi, so clyw is till in the loop
the number of towers is going to double to nearly 300,000
but there are exclusive agreements that keep access to those
towers closed to many competitors thus they need to cooperate
you act as if each solution that you propose against clyw
is the next big thing, if thats the case then why do you
put so much on the table, CLYW is ahead of the curve because
they are about cooperation and integration
as ive said before the next big thing isnt the next big thing
its integrating all the next big things togeather, and as for
your claims about no one even knowings about clyw, thats a
lie, so you can go on and lie all you want, to say that you
"think" or in your humble oppinion doubt, that they know
about clyw is also a lie, or very arrogant, that somehow
you as a blogger know more about the industry than those
w/ billions of dollars at their disposal, w/ massive research
resources constantly trying to find the next big thing to
infring on?
you also seem to be of the mind that because big companies
issue pr's everyday that by virtue of that you know all they
are doing and thinking...
leave the board until you can comeback w/ a forthright and
non-arrogant attitude mr know-it-all
p2k
AI
