Mining Company research board

[gitreal]

Which is exactly why GDSM owes it to their stockholders to release the Lewis report. Whether I have seen it or not is irrelevant - it is referenced in various places, and because it represents sampling data, GDSM should fess up with it! There are some on the GDSM board that daily bring up the lack of a PR or the sampling data. Others tell them to be patient. I would think the Lewis report would keep less patient investors happy for a while.

As to your point about the sampling being a waste of time to do it over - the Lewis report was only 14 sample points, and definitely not representative of the claims. And, it was done by someone that has no credentials, and the sampling methods were not discussed at all. The results did seem somewhat encouraging if you take them at face value.

Perhaps the current sampling program will be more credible than the Lewis sampling or that hokey 1964 report? If they do not have an Arizona-registered individual or at least a CPG overseeing the sampling and stamping the new report, they might as well not release it.