It's not that the Jenkins 2005 report isn't accurate or inaccurate, it's that it says nothing that can be backed up with hard data. No assay sheets, no test data, nothing but a rehash of another poorly documented report done in 1964. Jenkins provides nothing but unsubstantiated speculation about hundreds of millions in gold sitting out there. To base a mine's worth on speculation? Come on, most scams at least provide a few assay sheets.
I am not sure why you keep bringing up the Jenkins issue, it was beat to death a month ago on the GDSM board. Not much more to be said about it. But, since you brought it up, Jenkins resigned because he knew that his registration would be revoked. I cannot imagine a circumstance where someone would resign for any other reason, especially someone whose reputation depends on whatever registrations or certifications he might have. Besides, I thought Jenkins was irrelevant to GDSM?
Yes, I am posting an opinion, just as you are. I do happen to have the credentials that you apparently don't, but given the anonymity that this board requires, I would be crazy to give away any personal information.
As for the 1000 investors in GDSM? A few have totally bought into the dream of millions in gold, despite the lack of documentation, and are true longs. I feel sorry for them. Some say they are longs, but realize that gold will never be mined by GDSM and make their money playing the short game. Good luck to them. And then there are few honest ones that are admittedly shorts, and know that GDSM and the Gold Star claims are a scam. Some of them have PM'd me (you'd be surprised who they are), and those are the ones I respect the most.