InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1667
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/26/2011

Re: None

Wednesday, 06/13/2012 4:20:05 PM

Wednesday, June 13, 2012 4:20:05 PM

Post# of 52840
Insiders really need to start creating value and growth, thus growth in EPS and theoretically or artificially by distributing profit's to shareholders by issuing cash dividends, in the case of a numb market.
Life is good for insiders as their daily lifestyle and business is funded by continued shareholder support, ironically those shareholders, longs, are in the red, many from years back see their entire investments nearly worthless. I believe the time has come and is overdue to return the favor and payback, help those who had helped you. Turn the ship around for common shareholders, make it happen. It's a great company, run by talented people with great groundbreaking, industry saving tech. Green tech!, It would be a shame to see continued shareholder loss here, a blemish and shame within a great movement. The product and service this company provides are for our society, for us the people and it's us who decide where we should invest our money. This is a great green company, good for our planet and people so we invest to push it forward, to help you insiders to make it happen. Because it's supposed to better our society and our planet. It does not seem logical or right for it to succeed, when shareholders are left behind at losses. Look at the big picture, yes great industry saving inventions, patents, well paid insiders, business taking off, while the main supporters, the common shareholders, mainly us US citizens who this is mostly for look at their portfolios and see only red. Come on, success yet loss for longs? I have faith and hold, but is that reality? It does not seem feasible to periodically distribute cash dividends to shareholders when they're constantly being fleeced and bled for life support? Or can the tree be further trimmed on the inside to yield the profit? What kind of quarterly revenue is needed to halt dilution? $3 million in qtr's 4 and 1 was obviously not enough. We need the courts to take the infringers oil off the markets, I think industry wide that would create increased pressure from demand on a reduced supply and a spike in the price of the oil and therefore a rise in GERS licensees revenues and GERS 20% royalties. What's happening with the injunctions, I thought they were in the process?
Justice seems to be moving a bit slow, when the infringing is quite obvious. Let's hope the court wraps this up soon, so true justice is not mocked.




God is not mocked - He cannot be imposed on, or mocked. He knows what our real character is, and he will judge us accordingly. The word rendered "mocked" (µ??t????? mukterizo), means, properly, to turn up the nose in scorn; hence, to mock, or deride, or insult. The sense is, that God could not be imposed on, or could not be insulted with impunity, or successfully. To mock is, properly:

(1) To imitate, to mimic: to imitate in contempt or derision.

(2) to deride, to laugh at, to ridicule.

(3) to defeat, or to illude, or to disappoint.

(4) to fool, to tantalize - Webster.

Here it cannot mean to imitate, or to mimic, but it refers to the principles of the divine administration, and must mean that they could not be treated with contempt, or successfully evaded. They could not hope to illude or impose on God. His principles of government were settled, and they could not impose on him. To what the reference is here, is not perfectly plain. In the connection in which it stands, it seems to refer to the support of the ministers of the gospel; and Paul introduces the general principle, that as a man sows he will reap, to show them what will be the effect of a liberal and proper use of their property. If they made a proper use of it; if they employed it for benevolent purposes; if they appropriated what they should to the support of religion, they would reap accordingly. God could not be imposed on in regard to this. They could not make him think that they had true religion when they were sowing to the flesh, and when they were spending their money in purchasing pleasure, and in luxury and vanity.

No zeal, however ardent; no prayers, however fervent or long, no professions, however loud, would impose on God. And to make such prayers, and to manifest such zeal and such strong professions, while the heart was with the world, and they were spending their money for every thing else but religion, was mocking God. Alas, how much mockery of God like this still prevails! How much, when people seem disposed to make God believe that they are exceedingly zealous and devoted, while their heart is truly with the world! How many long prayers are offered; how much zeal is shown; how many warm professions are made, as if to make God and man believe that the heart was truly engaged in the cause of religion, while little or nothing is given in the cause of benevolence; while the ministers of religion are suffered to starve; and while the "loud professor" rolls in wealth, and is distinguished for luxury of living, for gaiety of apparel, for splendor of equipage, and for extravagance in parties of pleasure! Such professors attempt to mock God. They are really sowing to the flesh; and of the flesh they must reap corruption.