Here is the thing about this Freedom thing: there is another side that Tivus and SP need to adhere. Along with the freedom to comment, build a company, or post our opinions, is the RESPONSIBILITY to fulfill what we say we are going to do and perform. The law and most regulations give people freedom to act, but always within perameters of behavior that fulfill the investing communities' expectations. Those expectations are created by the company and in this case, SP. Investors read these and expect that officers of a company will act within these limits. No freedom is absolute, and anyone who thinks so is an anarchist. The difference in creating a company in the U.S. where law and regulation exists, and attempting to do the same in
Somalia, where anarchy and unrestrained "freedom" reigns. . . well, you get it. It doesn't happen! So when SP says we have a contract with $'s attached to it, we have a right to ask as investors, "Show us the money!" There is nothing disloyal in the question. SP has the freedom to claim he has this contract, and we have the responsibility to tell him we want this contract and it's dollar amount exposed to investors. If SP has some contractual limitation why he can't expose that information, then tell us that. If not, show us the money. Again, nothing disloyal in expecting our money bought us truth and a response from the company we all partially own.
Glta. R3
AI
