InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 129
Posts 3721
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: TFALL68 post# 62272

Tuesday, 06/12/2012 4:43:40 PM

Tuesday, June 12, 2012 4:43:40 PM

Post# of 232508
I've seen Dozens of Pennies that turned out to be crap. There are some subtle differences that are visible with KMAG.

*None of them used SEC filings the way KMAG does. KMAG goes by the book
*None of the other Pinkies had net income
*KMAG has hired Managers with excellent histories and backgrounds
*Again, the transparency issue, almost too transparent.
*KMAG has gone through all the expenditures and proper processing to acquire real patents. Look em up, they exist.
*Never been in a Pinkie that had royalty payments based on their technology. Have you?


Using your own logic, just because its a Penny stock doesn't mean its like every other Pinkie you've seen.

You've obviously done no in depth research on KMAG IMO. Your loss.