InvestorsHub Logo

es1

Followers 153
Posts 16535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2009

es1

Re: manshoon1 post# 44697

Sunday, 06/10/2012 1:29:05 AM

Sunday, June 10, 2012 1:29:05 AM

Post# of 276952
Manshoon how would you justify the PPS at .01? A "small deal? How small are you talking?

I suck at fundamentals so correct me if I am wrong but a deal that would be required for a .01 PPS would be a total of 500K a year. Not counting ANY IP or assets whatsoever.so at a normal silk price of 60K a ton you expect Kim to sign a deal of less then 1000 pounds a month?

That is just ridiculous. MS would demand a premium and so to drop to .01 we would have to sell less then 2 or 3 hundred pounds a month.

Kim would laugh in the face of anyone who expected this. My guess is there are 3-5 candidates. Each has received a sample of MS and they will have a set amount of time to be the highest bidder.

I would be seriously disappointed if Kim's first deal was not for at least a total of 12-24 tons a year at a price not less then 100K a ton.

That would be somewhere in the area of .05-.10 a share above the average PPS since the breakthrough which I would guess is around .09-.11 So a "small" deal to me would raise our PPS to a STABLE .16-.21 per share. That would be a spike probably well over .35 and over $1 if the momo hits.

My guess is our first deal will stabilize us over the .30 mark just because the "It's a pink scam" mentality could not survive with sales. People would go long and the trading float would shrink considerably.

People tend to forget that 99% of OTC stocks fail. When you are in the 1% that don't fail the PPS will triple just because the scam is "proven" false.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News