InvestorsHub Logo

euc

Followers 31
Posts 3395
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2011

euc

Re: dakotaben post# 31398

Wednesday, 06/06/2012 2:58:39 PM

Wednesday, June 06, 2012 2:58:39 PM

Post# of 80868
I completely agree with you on everything you stated there..

The fact that at one specific juncture in time we have a company banned from a major football league for substances, yet still NSF certified goes to show that they are in fact NOT an end all organization..

But it does raise some questions.. How trustworthy really is NSF.. when I get some coffee in me i'm going to put the two lists side by side and see if there are any other that are banned and on NSF.. might not be but worth a gander..

Also it goes to prove certain people wrong when they state that the NFL uses strictly NSF certified supplements where that is not the case.. and shows the NFL has its own substance abuse policies..

I know the NFLPA is working closely with the WADA on coming to an agreement for testing a lot of the articles that pulled up revolved around WADA has no set standard for HGH testing and they want to regulate NFL players on it.. whereas WADA has no literature, background, studies, or baselines for HGH. Big arbitration going on between the two.. as well as WADA and MLB..

I only bring this up because if the WADA is stepping in big with our Professional Sports leagues.. and MP is going for certification that is accredited by the WADA, then that is a good sign.. perhaps some things to come with MP banners at NFL games.. or on the back wall of a baseball field.. just some thoughts..