InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 491
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2012

Re: microcaps1 post# 71758

Monday, 06/04/2012 2:14:48 PM

Monday, June 04, 2012 2:14:48 PM

Post# of 91121
CWRN has a CE on it since last year. It has not been removed nor has Bob done anything to resolve it or uplist as promised. If it's so innocent, he could have done something - ANYTHING. He has not. That is fact and not an IMO like the rest of the CE discussion always is, which we've also been over many times.

Oh, and if Bob has a problem with OTC, he shouldn't have listed where he did and can always change.

we've been over this many times (do you see what I mean flasailin)-these arent promotions- a promo is paid for by somebody and promoter puts out a news blitz covering several days and many lengthy posts-in some of those promos the promoter also lists a list of stocks which are advancing -they arent paid for that and that is just a statement of fact -its not a promotion-paid or otherwise-just as otc has a list of advancers-thats not a promo .

As CWRN 1-31-11 PR noted there has been no promo and there will be no promo-as I've posted many times from Bullit69's posts--thats partly why every PR says the company is not promoting the stock

cwrn only had 1 promo-in early 2009-and the promoter destroyed the pps by dumping his shares so Bob vowed he would never do a promo again and they havent.

OTC personally told me on the phone they based their decision on the rapidly rising pps -gapping from day to day and intraday and because that doesnt usually happen without a massive newsletter promo they assumed that shorters who shouted promo to otc were right.

otc wasnt aware the pps was artificially depressed by many months of what many called unprecedented manipulation by etmm etc-they didnt do any investigation before instituting the ce-and they do this to hundreds of companies and some companies have noted in their pr's they dont even know why-

otc's conflict of interest inveighs against any investigation- ca 40% of otcs revenues come from co filings -so otc has a policy to pressure co's to upgrade to current class-more filings more money for otc-a publicly traded for profit company-not a regulatory organization at all- and imo their exercise of power over these co's stocks without reg authority is subject to class actions