Saturday, June 02, 2012 7:36:19 PM
not having NSF on the label has no significance in whether or not athletes will purchase the products.. it only effects their marketing..
as i stated even if NSF is on a product it is still the athletes responsibility to verify it for themselves... The NSF logo does not translate into a transfer of responsibility from athlete to provider. The athlete is still ultimately responsible for his intake..
The professional leagues do not hold NSF compliance as the only standard in which supplements are deemed acceptable or not.
How about you find an ingredient in each respective leagues banned substance policy that musclepharm currently uses in any of its supplements.... good luck I havent found any..
Like i said, you are grasping at straws. You find a negative thing dont let it go..
The company is still banned substance free with or without NSF certification because it is compliant with each leagues governing banned substance policy..
try again.
Maybacks Global Entertainment and ZEASN Technology Private Ltd. Sign Global Licensing Agreement • AHRO • Aug 8, 2024 7:00 AM
SANUWAVE Will Host a Conference Call on August 13, 2024 at 8:30 AM (ET) to Present Q2 Financial Results • SNWV • Aug 8, 2024 6:59 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Signs Letter of Intent with Bemax, Inc. to Sell Kona Gold, LLC • BMXC • Aug 7, 2024 10:00 AM
Btab Ecommerce Group, Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • BBTT • Aug 7, 2024 9:00 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Announces Preliminary Unaudited Second Quarter 2024 Financial Results and Provides Business Update • HYDI • Aug 7, 2024 8:52 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Startup, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 5, 2024 9:00 AM