InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 72
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/03/2010

Re: deafelephant post# 30515

Friday, 06/01/2012 6:21:24 PM

Friday, June 01, 2012 6:21:24 PM

Post# of 80868
Absolutely right. Codie posted a fact. Facts are what you analyze. No mindless pumping is beneficial, but you also don't go to the mirror, smear lipstick all over your face, throw on a disheveled wig and grind incessantly only one angle. Small picture is mainly negative. They had it, they promoted it, they lost it -- not good. Big picture is, do they need it? How much penetration into the free market do they have, how much loyal customer base? Can they still promote their product as safe? And will they make more money with it, or without it? Is it temporary? Is NSF flexing over the labeling issue? I agree that most people who are the core of supplement users want results. I have spoken to friends of mine who are using supplements and I mentioned how impressed I was that MP had no banned substances. I am impressed with that. They couldn't give a shit.