InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 3665
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/17/2010

Re: gump90 post# 8996

Monday, 05/28/2012 5:58:03 PM

Monday, May 28, 2012 5:58:03 PM

Post# of 31338
P+D Sorry I disagree

Two things happened in November of 09.

#1. Kat was naked shorted

#2. At the same time in November of 2009 Vale surrounded a Kat property with 300 square miles of lease land
I personally sold all the property I owned at that moment and bought KATX

To me

Unless Vale was in on a P+D

their was no P+D

It was simply a case of a naked shorting MM being caught off guard by the Giant Vale Inco

Never in Vales past did they sign a contract with a pink sheet Company

From that time forward MM's needed to 'COVER' and longs were not willing to give up shares

Do you need t see the links?





Again?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMSL News