Indocan Resources Inc. (IDCN)

[space1230]

No, your statement is exactly why my argument does not fail miserably. KA did not have to accept being custodian. This wasn't his lawsuit. It was a single shareholder. KA did not voice his anger on the non-dilution agreement? (1) Brush up on board posts. KA threatened to take the shell out of Jeffrey's hands. That's exactly what was done!

2) It was staged according to you. Yet do you believe that a shareholder would risk consequence with lying on court docs? Do you believe that KA would take such a "stage fight" risk of lying on court docs? Do u believe that KA knew of dilution and planned on creating excess losses within SCG? All of those consequences are so magnified compared to such a ridiculous "fake argument" theory that you have formed. Do you believe that Wyoming was in on "the fake-staged " argument too? Do believe that KA thought it was in his best interest to carry Jeffrey over to 'the other one' to slander and slam the life out it? KA wanted price appreciate there, not a jaded ceo from where he performed IR work for. Fake staged, hey JRB dismissed KA per website. Wouldn't it have been a better 'fake-staged' fight if JRB publicly severed ties with KA and never spoke to him again? Well he didn't. Kind of sloppy for a "fake-staged" argument theory there Pete.

OK. All of the aforementioned questions and statements are the reason why your "staged argument" creation has so many flaws.


RE: non-dilution agreement embarrassing him in front of his group of investors did he not voice his anger and do something there and then? ... Hence why your dilution argument fails, miserably