Colorado Goldfields Inc. (fka CGFI)

[M_T_Pockets]

Way too many errors in that post.

???? Wrong!!!!!
My post did not contain errors.

The items you placed in your latest post have no connection with my statements. If your post is a semantically based argument, then we are not talking about facts. That makes your post strictly an opinion.

Call it whatever one wants to, but it was a penalty and fine in the form of a performance bond. No other way to see it.

Those are your words.
The attempt to redefine the words' meaning does not make your argument valid or change the circumstances surrounding the POW mill.

Fact: a bond is returned when the conditions of the request for bonding are met.
Fact: a fine is not a returnable imposition.
That is a big difference, a $196,476 difference. CGFI will have their bond returned. If it was a fine, they would not.
So, there is a different way to see it. The way the law & Webster's define the terms, and the way your post presents it.
I will take the legal definitions and what Webster's dictionary defines their meaning to be.

Now where are the errors?

FYI, CGFI satisfied the financial requests made of them in the document you cited.

Just one of many items Cgi has continued to fail at rectifing,....

Another semantic claim or a redefinition?