InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 2631
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/26/2011

Re: Zorax post# 46405

Tuesday, 05/22/2012 7:26:08 PM

Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:26:08 PM

Post# of 67010

The pow didn't get there complying to violations.



Those are your words, not mine.

How does one "comply to violations"?

To be allowed to be in the TC classification, the POW will need to follow the requirements listed in the Act:
1.13.2 Indications of Temporary Cessation
(1) there are no personnel working at the site for one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days;
(2) there are only security personnel at the site;
(3) there are personnel other than security people at the site, but they are engaged i activities which can be described as maintenance or housekeeping, or related activity;
(4) there are personnel at the site, but they are engaged in activities which are n significantly moving the site towards completion of the mining operation. The Board wi judge these activities in relation to the size of the operation, the nature of the ore body an other facts;
(5) there is no sale or processing of material or movement of stockpiled material;
(6) there is only minimal or token excavation of mineral or other material; or
(7) mine development has ceased and mining has not recommenced.

And if you look up the permit, it is listed as "ACTIVE". The C&D does not effect this classification, not according to the DRMS.
Do I need to quote your own post again to show you where you said that yourself?

Active as in yearly fees paid up to now.


Your Post #45583, dated 5/7/12

You can't be classified as "Active", and "Temporary Cessation" at the same time.
Your posts contradict each other again and again.




Don't take my word for it, Do your own research! Then you will know it's true!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.