Franklin, Andrews, Kramer & Edelstein

[jurisper]

Weisberg features as part of the nexus of douchebaggery surrounding this VRAL thing I follow: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=75771950

A motion in limine by Weisberg in the lead-up to trial sought to exclude testimony from his former secretary at Baker & Mckenzie, who stated in a deposition that the only thing she ever saw him eat all day was a particular brand of raspberry candy bar & that she was sure he was doing drugs in the bathroom all the time.

This particular case is interesting as a by-blow of the Refco/BAWAG stuff. Eg: Thomas Hackl, the former signatory for Austost, Celeste & all the other BAWAG/Martin Schlaff toxic penny funds, and who in effect ended up as the liasion between BAWAG & Refco, arranged the original underlying transaction. Scammer vs scammer!