InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 38
Posts 1440
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/07/2004

Re: Thurly post# 80352

Monday, 05/21/2012 8:05:21 PM

Monday, May 21, 2012 8:05:21 PM

Post# of 346714
The recent trial data could very well have attained statistical significance, and it is wholly unrealistic to think Rob Garnick would endorse data that has not been adequately vetted. Simply won't happen. didn't happen. On the other hand, it is not clear why they would release data without fundamental statistical analysis included with it because it takes only minutes to accomplish. Several thoughts/explanations about that, but one is that it does tend to discredit any idea that the corporation is withholding and timing the release of important information. In the unlikely case the data is proven to be insignificant statistically, it would be ethically and investigationally unacceptable. I think we're okay here, and, in fact, bought some shares this afternoon for the first time in a long time. It seems almost inevitable that we are going to see some signicant overall survial data. Almost, I said.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News