InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252279
Next 10
Followers 49
Posts 644
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/02/2011

Re: DewDiligence post# 141725

Sunday, 05/13/2012 8:48:12 PM

Sunday, May 13, 2012 8:48:12 PM

Post# of 252279

Although not required for earlier RA drugs, the agency now wants one radiographic study with a large treatment effect.



Though Pfizer performed a radiographic analysis in one tofacitinib study, the agency perspective on these data was less than sanguine however. On pages 14-18 of the FDA briefing document on the Pfizer data, there were 5 concerns raised regarding these data (see document text). Thus the agency concluded that "it is not possible to make definitive conclusions about the treatment effect of tofacitinib on structural damage progression. This is particularly important in determining the overall benefit-risk profile of tofacitinib, which is associated with serious safety concerns..."

So based on this, do you feel that the agency will approve the drug? It sure seems that these Pfizer data may be (or remain) problematic. I did not see Pfizer alleviate any of the agency concerns in this regard. I do agree with the agency concerns here, and this was my basis in part that Pfizer would only obtain a plurality vote.

BJ

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.