InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 58
Posts 5124
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/02/2011

Re: None

Wednesday, 05/09/2012 4:07:51 PM

Wednesday, May 09, 2012 4:07:51 PM

Post# of 19444
Hypothetically speaking, say Camelot was involved (somehow) with "The Hunger Games". Maybe a co-production or revenue-sharing motif or something like that. (I say "revenue-sharing" as I once encountered a penny pharma in a similar situation. Their $20-per-share partner gets a drug for schizophrenia approved and BAM! The penny pharma "partner" has their stock go from $0.04 to $1.70 overnight! )

Assuming the hypothetical scenario is accurate, what would the new valuation of the stock be when the news is revealed?

"The Hunger Games" has so far taken in $600 million. Meanwhile, Camelot currently has 3.8 million shares out.


$600m/3.8m shares = $157 per share ?! Am I doing it right?


Could THIS be Atwell's grand scheme? It would certainly allow plenty of time for those series D preferred convertibles to kick in. And once they do, the stock would magically dilute itself as we all sell every newly created share back into the float. Could Atwell really be this forward-thinking?

The move would definitely put Atwell's stock in a position for up-listing to the NASDAQ.

Could that be why Atwell has chosen to ignore the whole "$0.55" chart bounce?! Because he knows a run to $0.55 for a couple of days won't qualify him for an up-listing?

The plot thickens!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.