InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252311
Next 10
Followers 75
Posts 4673
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: acgood post# 141591

Tuesday, 05/08/2012 7:53:37 PM

Tuesday, May 08, 2012 7:53:37 PM

Post# of 252311
SNTA - Regarding reasons for stating:

SNTA telegraphing that the ITT population PFS benefit won't be stat-sig at the interim




small number of events make such an outcome unlikely anyway



The subgroups that SNTA is talking about (KRAS wt and Squamous?) could, in aggregate, make up 70-85% of the total nsclc all-comers population. So if the HR for those two subgroups is <0.5 and there are 100 patients enrolled then as long as the 15-30 pct remainder isn't hurt it might well be stat sig. (Note that this is why I noted in an earlier post that INFI might actually have the ability to file first with their ITT trial which ends in Dec 2013 per clinicaltrials. If the FDA is willing to accept just 1 randomized trial labelled a ph 2.)

no statistical/significance phrase ever used in any of the commentary (subsets or otherwise)


No, nor would I expect it when no official word is going out - but PFS HR<0.5 is stat sig in the KRAS wt population out of 100 all-comers.


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.