Indocan Resources Inc. (IDCN)

[petergriffin]

No I won't. Why should I? In fact, he and you and other IDCN shareholders should be thankful to me since these words appear to have come about in no small part due to my own efforts. I said this is what was necessary for me to feel good about things and it is good to see Ken making an attempt to do exactly that.

I am also liking of the new name. It's a bit on the macho cheesy side but I like it. All it needs is a business behind it and Ken and investors can do really well here but so far as your request goes can you hear yourself? These problems have been going on for years. Many years. In a way, a decade. And you want me to say sorry now it seems everything is about to be corrected? Don't think so. Ken is merely making an attempt, by all accounts a decent attempt, at putting shareholders back to where they should be. So to some degree Ken is undertaking a thankless task. If he succeeds, that's what he was meant to do. If he fails, he'll be criticized. IMO no apology is required from investors whatsoever.

The real crux of the issue is that the excellent DD I and other posters did on this chat forum was not appreciated when it should have been. On any understanding, I was right because if I was wrong why did Ken mention the very things I harped on about using the very same terminology I frequently employed??

JMODYODD