>>>"there is no such thing as a patial (sic) mining permit for a hard rock mining operation in Colorade (sic), at least none that I know of"<<<
So, then without any credentials or references to this statement, it is another "WAG", like the 'simple advice' about the mortgaged ownership of the POW? (And how valid did that turn out to be?)
It seems this 'opinion' is really an argument with the DRMS, since they are the ones issuing the statement about "approve, approval with conditions, or deny".
By the way, EVERY approval has "conditions". They are the standard rules of the DRMS.
And another point, the mill is NOT a mine. It has different rules pertaining to it than a "hard rock mine".
To follow the logic in the statement that an "a permit approved is a (sic) approved permit - regardless if you have conditions tacked on. The permit is APPROVED." equates to the POW mill already being approved!!!. The DRMS has already issued a permit to the mill. It is still listed as "active". However, as we all know, it has a "C&D order" against it. (That too is a condition) It has not been "yanked", since that permit is still on the DRMS books as active.
This 'opinion' has no basis in fact, and is just one unsubstantiated comment containing multiple illogical conclusions.
JUST MY OPINION, and a little bit of research and common sense.
CGFIA
Don't take my word for it, Do your own research! Then you will know it's true!
