InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 2067
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/04/2000

Re: Rawnoc post# 181272

Sunday, 05/06/2012 5:59:27 PM

Sunday, May 06, 2012 5:59:27 PM

Post# of 312016
If in fact that photo is photoshopped I'd think it would be considered parody. I mean, it is funny, that's for sure.

"A form of speech protected by the First Amendment as a "distorted imitation" of an original work for the purpose of commenting on it."

"The use of parody as a means to express political and social views has a long history in the United States. Every president of the United States, including George Washington, has been the subject of satire and parody, often in the form of political cartoons. The cartoons, caricatures, and other forms of parody and satire typically distort and overly emphasize certain aspects of the subject's physical characteristics, such as Abraham Lincoln's lanky posture, franklin d. roosevelt's jutting jaw and cigarette holder, ronald reagan's long face and slick, black hair, and bill clinton's large nose and red cheeks. Although often comical, political cartoons and other forms of satire and parody have often immortalized the individuals portrayed."

"Parody and satire can be used for purposes beyond lighthearted comic intent. Many political cartoons, for example, have influenced the course of national debate. For instance, Thomas Nast, the famous nineteenth-century political cartoonist, published a series of post–Civil War cartoons in Harper's Weekly characterizing the activities of William M. "Boss" Tweed and other corrupt politicians in New York City's Tammany Hall political machine. More recently, countless political cartoonists drew caricatures of Clinton with Monica Lewinsky, the White House intern with whom Clinton had an affair. Clinton's dishonesty regarding the affair eventually led to his Impeachment by the House of Representatives in 1998."


http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/parody