InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253407
Next 10
Followers 839
Posts 120588
Boards Moderated 13
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: mouton29 post# 141310

Friday, 05/04/2012 12:43:10 PM

Friday, May 04, 2012 12:43:10 PM

Post# of 253407

If [ABT’s anti-FoB CP] were approved, what effect on MNTA? I would think, positive, on the theory it would hurt competition more than MNTA, which can reverse engineer around the trade secrets.

Very hard to say how things would shake out competitively if the FDA granted ABT’s request. The most likely outcome, IMO, would be an adverse effect on FoB players (including MNTA/BAX) who intend to rely on the 351(k) pathway and a marginal positive effect on such companies as MRK who intend to rely on the conventional BLA pathway (#msg-75071696).

As previously opined, I don’t give ABT’s CP much of a chance of influencing FDA policy on FoB’s.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.