We do proper 43-101's on the properties conducted by independent engineers with decades of experience in the particular mine environment and metal.
162,000 ounces of 16 grams AU was inferred for one property.
My advice to the supporters of the SUR play is to deal with issues brought up in a fair and balanced way, and not become like attack dogs on the mailman.
If you could discuss the points calmly and rationally it would do a lot more to support your cause. Needless wild accusations and vicious ad hominem tends to make more intelligent readers come to the conclusion that you fear some kind of weakness to the situation or suspect that there may be holes in the data, or troubles with the play/area/company. Otherwise why protest so violently?
All I said was that the sample could be misleading. This is possible and can only be refuted by propert sampling and drilling.
What ensues when you bait and attack, "credibility" is that people tend to take one side or another passionately. Causes and points tend to get exagerrated unecessarily and people might be forced into panicing one way or another. At this point panic can only be on the sell side. You won't shore up buying by this technique.
What loses credibility fast too is a play that is one sided like a stock house puff forum, where all other sides are given the run. Nobody with a room temperature IQ will put up with that sort of stuff for very long.
Right now the market is thin all over and support I will admit is easily shaken.
The problem with this last news announcement is that it is really a channel sample. They could get away with running it all together by calling it a bulk sample. It is cheating on the promotional side. It may not have been intentional to do so, but especially in oxidized tropical environments it should be carefully guarded against.
EC<:-}
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
