Yes!: We have a CON-"blem"! NOT a PRO-"blem"!
And THE CON-"blem" is this: Since every "thing" has "cause"
and "effect" --- NO "THING" E-VOLVES! Not even the DIS-cussion on 'price' v. 'value'! Which should be a PRO-cussion!
Even the [E-]VOLV-O didn't "evolve"!
And we may need some of the items that you list in order to both "under-stand" and "over-stand" this company --- besides many others.
You "see"?!: It's NOT a question of being on some "weed" or "drug" --- but in using pure "logic" which goes to the very "see-man-tics" and "see-wo-man-tics" (which MOST do NOT "see"!)! (And all-so throwing in a little "humour" which may not be AP-"preciated".)
And "TRUTH" IS STRANGER THAN THE "FICTIONS" --- even if ALL others neither "see" nor "under-stand" (nor "over-stand")!
Are "price" and "value" the same thing(s)? THAT is an "ether"-real question. More to the point is that they are so inter-twined their 'lives' cannot be separated.
As far as SRSR's stock "price" --- don't we really have several? We may 'choose' the 'closing price' for RE-"cording" purposes, but different people will offer different "prices" through-out each trading session, and some may even offer different "prices" from what they offered earlier WITH-IN the same trading session! (And then there are all-so different trading sessions over time(s).)
And then, as to "value": there are all-so several --- both to each individual (taking into account [some of] the items that you list, and other items [possibly]), and all-so 'eco-no-mic factors' not listed (all-so possibly).
Does one "value" the "stock" based upon 'the market' for the "stock" (the "stock price(s)") --- or does one "value" the "stock" based upon THE BILLIONS IN "POTENTIAL VALUE(S)", all-so factoring in EX-traction costs and so "forth"? (And in the case of this "stock" --- and so 'fifth'!)
Or does one "value" the "stock" in-be-tween the two EX-tremes while trying to EX-trapolate a (so-called) 'money' "stream"?! (Many of us/US have had an EX-"stream" with the (so-called) 'money' IN-"vested" in SRSR --- yet still looking to the "POTENTIAL VALUE(S)" to be REAL-"eyes"-ed in the "stock price(s)" at some point(s) in "the future"; EARNEST-LY WANTING THAT "future" to be --- NOOOWWWWW!!!)
And then other 'personal situations' will, of course, all-so be factored in-to these equations ... of "price" vs. "value".
Have a "nice" one....
