Colorado Goldfields Inc. (fka CGFI)

[cadreaminguy]

I agree 100% with posts 768-769! Major difference between venting in a letter to a Government Office as opposed to having your attorney take your case to the proper jurisdictional entity on your behalf. Publicly, the facts are clear; she hasn't done that. Privately, however, your guesses are as good as mine as to what Powell's next move/moves may be, IF ANY!

Money/attorneys talk, B------t walks. So far, the Hennis and Powell letters are mere B------t. As are certain italic responses. CGI's attorneys are hard at work on our behalf as we speak - and they owe the shareholders ZERO EXPLANATION OF THEIR PROGRESS! That is prudent handling of business affairs. AND, our attorneys HAVE, in fact, addressed both the Hennis and Powell situations, and those letters FROM the DRMS website have been posted here on this board. (Some here need to go back back and re-read those letters from CGI's attorneys). The behind the scenes wrangling and negotiations between all concerned parties, again, is none of our concern at this time - later, but not now. We need only to be concerned with watching the pps go north, AND waiting to hear the outcome of the upcoming hearing (and not in that order).

GL