InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 13261
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/07/2012

Re: None

Monday, 04/23/2012 1:54:33 PM

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:54:33 PM

Post# of 59720
...Legal hurdle = PREPONDERANCE of the evidence...

...the OTS behavior in seizing the bank was troubling in that it was sloppy..........no documentation whatsoever.............the OTS did not even mail the 1-2010 bank exam and admitted it did not mail the report................then the OTS openly communicated with the FDIC to seize the bank without waiting for the CRP or even making reference to the CRP..................THIS CASE IS A SLAM DUNK...............the OCC's attorneys can file some VOLUMINOUS legalese rhetoric in answering the motion for a summary judgement.............

...................this case can get drawn out for another 2 years and we ultimately lose the case in court..........so what...????

.............IN MY MIND, IT DOESN'T MATTER BECAUSE THE TRUTH IS: THE OTS ILLEGALLY SEIZED THE BANK............a gross abuse of POLICE POWER......................WE WIN.....................all IMO...................$175-million = $4.00 p/s, adjusted.........

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.